Coverage · stated plainly

What we cover, and what we do not

51 states have a jurisdiction file behind them and get a page. 0 do not, and they get an honest row instead of a page with nothing in it.

454 source documents on fileoldest revision 1972last retrieved 2026-10-1851 covered0 not coveredFree · no account needed
covered

The 51 states with a jurisdiction file

A state is covered when it has a data file behind it: legal limits, a fee schedule, escort rules and superload triggers, every value carrying its own source document and effective window. The counts below are computed from those files, not maintained by hand.

StateSource documentsEscort rules in effectLive source conflictsDocument datesLast read
Alabama 9 28 — 2016-01-18newest 2025-10-01 2026-09-02
Alaska 2 16 — 2023-04-01newest 2024-01-11 2026-10-04
Arizona 17 13 1 2022-07-08newest 2022-07-08 2026-10-03
Arkansas 8 11 — 2023newest 2025-08-04 2026-09-03
California 16 23 — 1988-09-28newest 2026-05-01 2026-10-15
Colorado 10 27 1 2008-08-05newest 2025-06-10 2026-09-03
Connecticut 2 15 — 2022-07-01newest 2022-07-01 2026-10-03
Delaware 7 16 1 2022-11-01newest 2022-11-01 2026-10-03
District of Columbia 3 4 — 1986-06-20newest 2023 2026-09-06
Florida 8 19 2 2016-08-23newest 2026-07-27 2026-09-02
Georgia 10 15 2 2011-07-01newest 2026-02-01 2026-10-13
Hawaii 13 5 — 1981-05-30newest 2026-07-08 2026-10-03
Idaho 6 6 1 2024-03-26newest 2026-07-01 2026-10-03
Illinois 12 8 — 1996-01-25newest 2026-06-16 2026-10-16
Indiana 7 9 2 2022-04-01newest 2026-07-01 2026-09-01
Iowa 10 13 — 2025-02-05newest 2026-07-15 2026-10-16
Kansas 12 10 1 1997-08-15newest 2025-03-05 2026-10-03
Kentucky 9 26 — 2003-06-24newest 2026-07-15 2026-09-02
Louisiana 14 19 1 1994-04-01newest 2025-06-20 2026-09-03
Maine 5 11 — 2025-10-20newest 2025-10-20 2026-10-03
Maryland 5 14 2 2008-04-10newest 2012-12-24 2026-10-13
Massachusetts 4 2 — 2014-01-31newest 2014-01-31 2026-10-03
Michigan 11 9 1 2018-05-14newest 2026-04-07 2026-09-05
Minnesota 13 11 2 2001newest 2025-05-01 2026-09-05
Mississippi 15 20 2 2024-09-21newest 2026-01-13 2026-10-13
Missouri 8 31 — 2020-08-28newest 2026-01-01 2026-09-01
Montana 7 13 — 2020-08-29newest 2026-07-27 2026-10-15
Nebraska 6 9 1 2014newest 2026-10-01 2026-10-03
Nevada 8 9 — 2008-06-17newest 2019-08-21 2026-09-05
New Hampshire 6 9 — 1989-06-18newest 2023-07-01 2026-10-03
New Jersey 8 10 — 2010-08-02newest 2024-01-05 2026-09-02
New Mexico 6 8 — 2001newest 2022-06-01 2026-10-03
New York 10 10 2 1995-09-01newest 2026-04-01 2026-09-01
North Carolina 11 14 3 2019-11-01newest 2025-03-01 2026-09-02
North Dakota 4 12 2 2022-01-01newest 2025-11-21 2026-10-03
Ohio 7 9 — 2001-06-29newest 2023-11-03 2026-10-17
Oklahoma 10 22 — 2022-07-01newest 2026-07-01 2026-09-01
Oregon 10 26 1 2024-01-01newest 2026-07-01 2026-10-03
Pennsylvania 14 7 1 1981-01-17newest 2025-07-01 2026-09-01
Rhode Island 4 6 1 2022-06-27newest 2025-06-10 2026-10-03
South Carolina 12 20 — 1972newest 2026-07-01 2026-10-16
South Dakota 8 5 — 1991-04-08newest 2023-05-01 2026-09-06
Tennessee 13 26 1 2018-05-15newest 2025 2026-09-03
Texas 11 10 1 2021-02-01newest 2026-01-01 2026-08-31
Utah 6 20 — 2017-05-09newest 2026-03-16 2026-09-05
Vermont 7 10 2 2022-07newest 2025 2026-10-03
Virginia 14 21 — 1989newest 2024-07-01 2026-09-02
Washington 13 22 — 1984-03-07newest 2026-06-11 2026-09-02
West Virginia 7 20 — 2023-03-17newest 2023-11-08 2026-10-18
Wisconsin 8 10 1 2021-06-01newest 2026-09-04 2026-09-05
Wyoming 3 8 — 2021newest 2025-04-30 2026-10-18
not covered

The 0 we do not hold, and why they have no page

These states appear as a row on every topic table, marked "not yet covered", and nowhere else. No state page ships without a jurisdiction file behind it. A page titled "Wyoming oversize permits" that contains no Wyoming thresholds is worse than no page: it ranks, it is opened by somebody planning a real move, and it answers nothing. That pattern is common in this market and we are not reproducing it at any page length.

What we will not do to fill the gap: copy figures from another commercial site. Two of them publish permit fees for half the states under a title claiming all of them, cite no state DOT between them, and carry errors in the dangerous direction — a legal-limit figure a foot over the statute reads as legal and is not. Inheriting a chain like that is how a wrong number and a copyright problem arrive together.

rules

The rules we hold ourselves to

  • No value without a document. Every number is stored with its source, that source's own revision date, our retrieval date, and the window it is effective for.
  • No adjudicating a conflict. Two in-effect official documents that disagree are both published and neither is adopted, and the calculator refuses to price that field.
  • No filling a gap with a guess. A measurement we were not given evaluates to "cannot tell", never to zero and never to "no requirement" — because a requirement chosen by an absence is a confident wrong answer.
  • Freshness is per fact, not per page. A page's modification date is the newest retrieval date among the sources actually rendered on it. It is never the deploy time, because a freshness claim we cannot substantiate per fact would cost us the only thing these pages have.

One of those rules, rendered live

Arizona — superload gross-weight threshold

over 250,000 lb Ariz. Admin. Code § R17-6-211 — Class C single trip special permit; review, analysis and engineering fees — Arizona Administrative Code (via Cornell LII) — SECONDARY, Cornell LII. Document date: "New section made by final rulemaking at 19 A.A.R. 2486, effective September 7, 2013. Renumbered from R17-6-204 and amended by final rulemaking at 28 A.A.R. 1264, effective 7/8/2022." Source of the "exceeds 250,000 pounds" class C trigger, the "requires pre-approval by the Class C Unit" note, and the $15/$25 review-and-analysis and $75/$125-per-50-mile engineering-analysis fees.
rev. · read
over 140,000 lb Ariz. Admin. Code § R17-6-212 — Tridem axle permits; the stale 140,000 lb cross-reference — Arizona Administrative Code (via Cornell LII) — SECONDARY, Cornell LII; rule effective 7/8/2022. Subsection (E) states a 140,000 lb class C trigger and routes the applicant to "R17-6-204", which the SAME rulemaking renumbered to R17-6-211. Recorded as one side of a conflict and flagged as a stale cross-reference rather than adjudicated away.
rev. · read

Both documents are official, both are in effect, and neither has been adopted. That refusal is computed, not typed — and it is what a "Source:" line under a table structurally cannot say.

↑ Back to the contents